![]() |
| Fassbender is magnetic...Get it? Anyone? |
How do you
measure the best films you see? What system do you use to determine whether a
film is “great” or not? I’m not asking as a reviewer. I’m asking as a
moviegoer. When you look back on the best movies you’ve ever seen, why do you
think they were the best? More often than not, those movies will be the ones
you can see yourself watching over and over again.
But there
should be a special place reserved in our hearts for the movies that aren’t
easy to relive. We’ve all seen those. They’re dark, they’re real, they’re
emotionally harrowing, and while we can walk away deeply moved and impressed by
the cinematic power we’ve just witnessed, we can’t imagine going through it
again anytime soon. Shame
, Steve McQueen’s second feature film, should be
added to that list.
The premise
is deceptively simple. Brandon (Michael Fassbender, who also starred in
McQueen’s first film, Hunger) has a great job and a great New York apartment,
but struggles privately with an increasingly disruptive sex addiction. His life
is further complicated by the arrival of his free-spirited sister Sissy (Carey
Mulligan) on his doorstep, fresh off a lovers’ quarrel and looking for a place
to crash. As his addiction consumes more and more of his time and energy,
Brandon finds his private life suffering, and an air of desperation sets in.
I was
immediately amazed by how physically beautiful the film is. The first shot is a
wonderfully composed portrait of Fassbender lying in bed, staring at the
ceiling. From there, McQueen uses the cityscape to his advantage, crafting
magnetic and compelling images even amid the ugliest of human struggles. It’s a
juxtaposition that makes the film both visually fascinating and emotionally
complex.
McQueen’s
skill as a writer also shines here. Shame never descends into clichéd
melodrama or becomes a sensationalized tale of moral consequences. It’s the
story of a man’s battle with himself, told well and told true, and even in its
slowest moments (of which there are a few) that adherence to a genuine,
unadorned story keeps it compelling.
The center
of the film, though, both logistically and emotionally, is Fassbenber. It’s a
masterful performance. Brandon doesn’t talk much, doesn’t ever have one of
those great confessional moments that allows him a measure of redemption. The
movie’s called Shame, after all, and Fassbender lets it seep into every pore
of the character. He’s only now becoming a true movie star, but this film also
proves that Fassbender is one of the finest actors of his generation. Mulligan
also shines, balancing out Brandon’s often cold demeanor with fire and
vulnerability.
Shame is
not an easy film to watch, but it is nonetheless an extraordinary one.
Sometimes the best films are the most harrowing, and even if you only see this
one once, it’s a trip worth taking.
Shame is available everywhere on Blu-Ray and DVD.

Rating the 'bestness' of a film is a difficult thing to do. There are definitely some films where I can say, "Yes, that was a very good film. An award-winning film. However, I never want to see it again." I wouldn't be able to include something like that on a favorites list, but I would definitely recommend it to others.
ReplyDeleteOn the other hand, I have films on my favorites list which I wouldn't necessarily call 'great,' but I have watched an inappropriate number of times. (oh glorious, tattered VHS copy of Clueless from my youth...)
Great review. Kudos for not succumbing to the temptation of calling him Fassmember.